Creative Communications students don't do all their work in the classroom.
Neil Babaluk's Independent Professional Project, for example, takes him to Manitoba's 77 road-accessible provincial parks.
Check out Babaluk's blog on the Winnipeg Free Press website. More installments all summer long.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
OMG! English is taking over the world!
Inspired by the blogs of the students in my Intersession course (links at right of this screen), I am providing a list of resources for anyone interested in editing for print or online media.
How online media are helping the English language conquer the world: an excerpt from Globish: How the English Language Became the World’s Language by Robert McCrum, and a New York Times review of the book.
Numbers are our friends! Especially percentages and percentage points.
Here are two explanations.
Purdue University’s OWL provides many useful resources dealing with writing and editing.
Check out the section on logic.
These points on logic are particularly useful when editing advertising and public relations material -- and, of course, journalism.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Good news about the news
With lively news and thoughtful commentary from south of the 49th parallel, The Atlantic is always worth a stop on a curious Canadian's online odyssey.
My current favourite Atlantic item is How to Save the News by James Fallows, also in the June 2010 edition of The Atlantic magazine.
His thesis: Google knows that people will use its search engine only if it brings them interesting or useful information. Since the source of much of this stuff -- "the news" -- is traditional news media, it is in Google's interest to support and develop those media.
Google's goal, Fallows writes, is "a reinvented business model to sustain professional newsgathering." Well, lots of people are trying to create one.
But here's a change.
Rather than ignoring or trying to destroy traditional news media, Google's model would incorporate old-fashioned, high-cost news gathering such as (in Canada, which Fallows ignores, since being American means never having to say you're sorry) knowledgeable, long-term coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada.
It would also include, on the same site, immediate, exciting, unedited amateur-created video from hot spots such as Bangkok during the Thai military attacks on Red Shirt protesters.
Who would pay for this? Subscribers in some cases, advertisers in others, or some shifting blend of the two. Let a thousand business models bloom.
Today's media-rich but often wisdom-depleted online world faces a central problem. In Fallows's words, "The internet is a great way to get news but often a poor way to read it."
There's a device for that, of course: a Google device (coming soon ... really) that would re-create the serendipity of leafing through a magazine, discovering the beautiful colour ads and surrendering to the other content that you did not know you would be interested in.
Sounds like Google propaganda? Maybe. You need to keep your bullshit detector cranked up.
But what I love about this piece is its unusual and optimistic view of the news business -- a business, after all, that has adapted to every new technology since smoke-blackened sticks on cave walls.
Spoiler! How to Save the News contains more than 140 characters. You'll have to spend a bit of time reading it.
But your investment of time and thinking will pay off. You can tweet about it.
My current favourite Atlantic item is How to Save the News by James Fallows, also in the June 2010 edition of The Atlantic magazine.
His thesis: Google knows that people will use its search engine only if it brings them interesting or useful information. Since the source of much of this stuff -- "the news" -- is traditional news media, it is in Google's interest to support and develop those media.
Google's goal, Fallows writes, is "a reinvented business model to sustain professional newsgathering." Well, lots of people are trying to create one.
But here's a change.
Rather than ignoring or trying to destroy traditional news media, Google's model would incorporate old-fashioned, high-cost news gathering such as (in Canada, which Fallows ignores, since being American means never having to say you're sorry) knowledgeable, long-term coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada.
It would also include, on the same site, immediate, exciting, unedited amateur-created video from hot spots such as Bangkok during the Thai military attacks on Red Shirt protesters.
Who would pay for this? Subscribers in some cases, advertisers in others, or some shifting blend of the two. Let a thousand business models bloom.
Today's media-rich but often wisdom-depleted online world faces a central problem. In Fallows's words, "The internet is a great way to get news but often a poor way to read it."
There's a device for that, of course: a Google device (coming soon ... really) that would re-create the serendipity of leafing through a magazine, discovering the beautiful colour ads and surrendering to the other content that you did not know you would be interested in.
Sounds like Google propaganda? Maybe. You need to keep your bullshit detector cranked up.
But what I love about this piece is its unusual and optimistic view of the news business -- a business, after all, that has adapted to every new technology since smoke-blackened sticks on cave walls.
Spoiler! How to Save the News contains more than 140 characters. You'll have to spend a bit of time reading it.
But your investment of time and thinking will pay off. You can tweet about it.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
And the winner is ...
To find the screwup in the For Better or For Worse comic strip in my previous blog, check out the last panel.
The sound of a door whose hinges need oiling is not usually spelled the same way as "a tributary of a river; a stream or brook" (Canadian Oxford Dictionary, second edition, 2004).
Congratulations to commenter Wade (CreComm '09) and to several students in my editing class.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Spot the Screwup
Here's an example of an assignment in my Editing Print and Online Media class.Can you spot a screwup in the For Better or For Worse comic strip of May 17, 2010?
Come back for the answer after class on May 18.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Regret the Error
Until late June I plan to post short items relevant to my Intersession course Editing Print and Online Media.
To start, here is Regret the Error, a wonderful site that could be called Edit Fail.
It displays some of my favourite content from newspapers and other publications: corrections.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
It's Intersession time!
On May 11 a small but select group of students will begin taking my Intersession course Editing Print and Online Media.
In the newsroom at the Princess Street campus of Red River College in Winnipeg we will work on improving our skills at organizing and editing material for ... yes, print and online media.
You can register for the course until the day it begins. There are no prerequisites other than a good understanding of English, so you do not need to be a Creative Communications student to join us.
The students who have registered so far have completed the first year of CreComm. As part of that curriculum they have created the blogs that are listed on the right side of this page.
One of their assignments will be to blog at least weekly on a topic related to the course, so you will be able to follow the public part of our learning.
Another assignment is Spot the Screwup. Students look for mistakes online, on billboards, on bus boards, in all kinds of print media. Then they fix them.
It's a dishearteningly easy assignment. Guess that means there will always be jobs for editors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)